Opinions — practitioners on trends, debates and workflow choices
The Opinions section is for take-the-position essays from people who ship AI and no-code work daily. Not generic "AI will change everything" think pieces — sharper claims backed by concrete experience: which tools are over-hyped, which workflows are quietly winning, where the industry is making the same mistake twice.
What gets published
Three flavours. Tool takes: "I tried switching from Cursor to Windsurf for a month — here's what changed", "Why we still use Bubble in 2026 despite the Webflow noise". Industry debates: "Agents won't replace SaaS, and that's fine", "Open-source LLMs vs. closed APIs — the real cost gap". Process essays: personal workflows, team setup patterns, the tools that made the cut and the ones that didn't.
Every opinion piece carries the author's bio and stake — what they build, who they work with, why they hold this view. Disagreement is fine and gets replied to in follow-up posts. We avoid corporate fence-sitting: if the author thinks a popular tool is bad for production, they say so and name names.
Why opinions matter
Tutorials tell you how; case studies tell you what happened; opinions tell you which questions to ask before either. Reading a strong take that disagrees with your default stack is the cheapest way to stress-test assumptions before a costly migration or hire.
Submitting an opinion piece
If you ship with AI / no-code daily and have a take you've defended at least once in a real meeting, send a pitch through the contact form. We publish authored pieces only — no ghost-written corporate think-leadership.
